Abstract

This article examines the impact that relations among three non-governmental organisations (NGOs) working with child labourers in El Salvador have on the effectiveness of the NGO's development assistance. Each of the organisations has chosen a different approach to child labour – one of them views it as an inevitable consequence of poverty that cannot be addressed separately from other developmental problems, while another one regards it a violation of children's human rights in need of imminent eradication. The third organisation falls somewhere in between, promoting child-labour bans in theory but not fully enforcing them in practice. The three NGOs neither collaborate nor communicate with each other. As a result, the overall effect of their work is hindered by a small scale of projects, high transaction costs, potential duplication, and contradicting strategies to addressing child labour. Some of these shortcomings could be improved via intensifying organisations' mutual coordination. However, more communication on its own would likely not lead to greater coherence in the approach to addressing child labour on the national level, as it appears that the NGOs devise their strategies and projects on the basis of their donors' preferences rather than on the basis of their beneficiaries' needs. I conclude with the observation that in order to increase their effectiveness, NGOs working in child labour, and in other divisive development topics, should be in closer coordination not only with each other but also with the governments of the countries where they work.